[kdewebdev-site] Moving forward
Eric Laffoon
eric at kdewebdev.org
Wed Mar 17 03:06:20 EST 2004
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
as most of you probably know I've been generally buried for some time. It's
actually a little embarassing how far behind I am on some other site work.
However I'm making excellent progress with vast changes, if you don't count
all the delays from the amount of time I've spent dealing with Quanta. That
is approaching a manageable state. Having a lot of balls in the air keeps me
focused anyway as I become bored too easily if I'm not at 110%.
It's about 2 AM here and I'm looking through the list traffic and subscribers.
This list has now been open 3 weeks and of course it started behind schedule.
We currently have a total of 15 subscribers. It is my assumption that
everyone that is here is here because they plan to be contributing in some
way. Over the next week I intend to get the definition of roles and tasks in
place. It is key that we quickly achieve momentum. In order to make that a
soothing rhythm and not a cacophony I will be laying out out guidelines. What
follows is a thumbnail.
Logically we should arrive at a conclusion for our essential layout so that
Américo can begin on the visuals. To that end I have posted my proposal and
as I am sure I'm not perfect I would like any comments or suggestions you
have. If we don't have any we proceed with it as is. Also we do not actually
have a logo other than our icons or splash and a nice logo would be a good
thing. It would also be nice to have one that scales down for "built with
Quanta+".
For other factors, in the next few days I will post a Knowit file
at /home/kdewebdev which will be a central reference to our design. Our
design will proceed targeting open and easily maintained code that produces
exemplary markup. At this time I know Chris has some things he has been
working on that I need to review. Our objective is to organically expand from
our concepts and guidelines to function on an "agreeable path". This is how
Quanta it's self runs. I do not need to review everything because we operate
with common goals and a common undertanding of procedures. Because this works
I intend to model it here too.
It is important to keep in mind that while I have a great deal of creativity I
am also busy with other things. My objective is to spend as little time on
this site as possible to do a good job. That means several things...
1) You push, I pull. I'm not inviting chaos. I'm saying that I want people
offering creative input, code and offering to do things that clearly need to
be done. By being proactive you can introduce things we can benefit from and
you can reduce my required effort. What makes this work is having a solid
feel for what you are doing and if what you're offering isn't getting good
reviews not dwelling on it.
2) Procedures on the fly. I will outline some guidelines and objectives. This
is a large project so just outlining it is a huge task. Since that outline
will be somewhat rough, as we encounter areas not outlined they will be
filled in. This means how we go about doing what we do will be shaped on this
list, much as it has with Quanta.
3) Assistants welcome. As this process unfolds we will be keeping details of
procedures and objectives either in an Knowit file or listed out in a private
portion of this site. This means that anyone who can assist me in recording
this "refinement of the plan as we go" helps to ease the ongoing maintenance
issues and bringing in new developers.
4) Tasks and areas. One of the things I am focusing on with Quanta is getting
people to assume roles. These can be for a task, an area of the project or a
conceptual position that occurs across areas. The point to this is that a
person with a high focus on specifics is likely to be more capable with those
specifics than someone who has oversight over all. Seeing the whole project
as I do makes me most likely to have the best over all vision, but precludes
the likelihood of me having the best detail vision in all areas. As the
project unfolds if you believe you have a good vision of a task, area or
process you need to step forward.
Over the next few days I will begin making some core code commits of support
functions that will have no bearing on overall design. They are things I've
found useful over years of volume development. As Andras can certainly attest
to I do not win every argument. I don't want to, unless I can prove I'm
right. If anyone believes there is a good reason to challenge something
coming from me they need to bring it up here or email me. I hope we can all
be friends here, and on the off chance I might make a fool of myself I hope
you will help me avoid that.
My objective for this time next week is that we have the following:
1) Our basic structure concluded for layout work
2) Some general support code in CVS
3) Review of some code for the site completed
4) At least 5 people committed to roles and in process of defining them
5) further outlining of base pages done
6) Initial data layout for developer section databases
7) A largely workable structure and procedures document in place to refer to
As usual I realize this won't all happen but you can't hit what you don't aim
at.
I am looking for people to volunteer to write copy and further develop the
site outline once we agree on the menus.
I realize some of what I'm suggesting sounds a bit chaotic. I believe in the
balance of paradox. The best projects are carefully planned but you can't
adjust direction on what is not in motion and momentum can exponentially
affect volume. Ironically KDE is a very chaotic project in many ways that is
very productive. I would like to get our team involved and I'm willing to
deal with a little chaos as long as our chaos resolves with a common
direction.
I've handled several other emails and some coding so now it's much later and
I'm off to bed.
- --
Eric Laffoon - Quanta+ Team Leader
http://kdewebdev.org eric at kdewebdev.org
Mailing list - http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/quanta
GPG Fingerprint: 48FB 218D 747F A54A 319D EE98 4A25 794E A453 004B
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAWDEtSiV5TqRTAEsRAtodAKCRB4kayJjf3UksEhotFoiW6lz0IgCdG4Y3
DDO6sJjxG1E8VOM2VayoNl4=
=YflQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the kdewebdev-site
mailing list