[kdewebdev-site] Proposed KdeWebDev site structure <- Final?

[Andras Mantia]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 03 March 2004 10:27, Eric Laffoon wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 March 2004 12:09 am, Andras Mantia wrote:
> > On Wednesday 03 March 2004 07:25, Bill Chmura wrote:
> > > So is this good with everyone?
> > >
> > >
> > > Quanta Plus
> > > Kommander
> > > KImageMapEditor
> > > Ksxldbg
> > > Kfilereplace
> > > News (agregator of news throughout project)
> > > Download (???)
> > > Support  (links to specific subsites and support there)
> > > Developer area
> >
> > I need another entry for another application (as I hat SF's way of
> > updating and uploading things). It's called Kallery and hopefully it will
> > be integrated to kdewebdev during the following months.
>
> Did you miss the review? It's too late to submit it again. ;-)
Maybe.

> Do you want me to get you a subdomain? I hate to ask, but will you really
> have time? It's now facing a lot of similar programs. Do you want to
> conduct a review to optimize the feature set and integration with Quanta
> with me? It's really pretty close to being at the level we would need, but
> I'm sure you would have done even better now. Anyway if you're going to
> move your baby we should do it.

I still have requests for it, sometimes even help offered, and I think it
still has big potential. Some of our Quanta uses use it as well. The
integration can be done max. in a week or so, and I'd need a space for it (if 
it's
a subdomain, it's better). Recently it was removed from freshmeat, as the
virtualartisans server was not reachable. So yes, I'd like to have a place.


> > Also regarding support: I'd like to NOT have a support e-mail link which
> > point to Eric's and my email address. This is fine to get some feedback,
> > or even to try to users that they should use a newer Quanta to get rid of
> > bugs, but: - often we got reports like "doesn't work". No version, etc.
> > specified. If you are forced to use bugs.kde.org, than you have to
> > provide some more information there, which is good
> > - the mails can be forgotten, while reports on bugs.kde.org are there
> > until someone closes them
> > - for general support they can write to the users list
> > - sometimes they give non-existant email addresses, so I can't reach them
> > with the answer
> > - it's just too much mail arriving in a non-organized way.
>
> Those are very good points, but I think they haven't been proposed to be
> copied.

I know, but I had this in my mind since long time and wanted to be clear that
I don't want to see a similar support link on the new site.

> They originated prior to being in the KDE CVS and maybe even before
> KDE had bugzilla. You're right. I will be glad when they are gone.
>
> BTW we can validate emails and then query the server to leave only a
> legitimate forgery as a bad option. Sourceforge for some reason puts a non
> address in the from for those not logged in even though we gather their
> address. So you have to go to the body and copy it. I hate that.
I know, but it happened that even that address didn't work and I get back
mails that "user does not exists". :-0 How can I reach a reporter if he gives
me an invalid address?

Andras

- --
Quanta Plus developer - http://quanta.sourceforge.net
K Desktop Environment - http://www.kde.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFARZtCTQdfac6L/08RArMeAKDS7auuVfVXNTkMpJPLYcpCOzXmNQCePkXJ
Juow2lKd4dAlsx295ZVND6I=
=rdIL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----