[kdewebdev-site] Proposed KdeWebDev site structure <- Final?

[Eric Laffoon]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 03 March 2004 12:09 am, Andras Mantia wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 March 2004 07:25, Bill Chmura wrote:
> > So is this good with everyone?
> >
> >
> > Quanta Plus
> > Kommander
> > KImageMapEditor
> > Ksxldbg
> > Kfilereplace
> > News (agregator of news throughout project)
> > Download (???)
> > Support  (links to specific subsites and support there)
> > Developer area
>
> I need another entry for another application (as I hat SF's way of updating
> and uploading things). It's called Kallery and hopefully it will be
> integrated to kdewebdev during the following months.

Did you miss the review? It's too late to submit it again. ;-)

Do you want me to get you a subdomain? I hate to ask, but will you really have
time? It's now facing a lot of similar programs. Do you want to conduct a
review to optimize the feature set and integration with Quanta with me? It's
really pretty close to being at the level we would need, but I'm sure you
would have done even better now. Anyway if you're going to move your baby we
should do it.
>
> Also regarding support: I'd like to NOT have a support e-mail link which
> point to Eric's and my email address. This is fine to get some feedback, or
> even to try to users that they should use a newer Quanta to get rid of
> bugs, but: - often we got reports like "doesn't work". No version, etc.
> specified. If you are forced to use bugs.kde.org, than you have to provide
> some more information there, which is good
> - the mails can be forgotten, while reports on bugs.kde.org are there until
> someone closes them
> - for general support they can write to the users list
> - sometimes they give non-existant email addresses, so I can't reach them
> with the answer
> - it's just too much mail arriving in a non-organized way.

Those are very good points, but I think they haven't been proposed to be
copied. They originated prior to being in the KDE CVS and maybe even before
KDE had bugzilla. You're right. I will be glad when they are gone.

BTW we can validate emails and then query the server to leave only a
legitimate forgery as a bad option. Sourceforge for some reason puts a non
address in the from for those not logged in even though we gather their
address. So you have to go to the body and copy it. I hate that.

Eric
>
> Andras
>
> > Later
> >
> > Bill
> > _______________________________________________
> > kdewebdev-site mailing list
> > kdewebdev-site at mail.kdewebdev.org
> > http://mail.kdewebdev.org/mailman/listinfo/kdewebdev-site
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFARZcGSiV5TqRTAEsRAqK8AJ9wJIZL93gFbMkeSsYNA+E4N2dL8wCeKFoi
rXFQkWVj/fPRPINFb2IyNso=
=N3Jj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----