[kdewebdev-site] Proposed Quanta public site structure

[Bill Chmura]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tuesday 02 March 2004 12:34 am, Chris Hornbaker wrote:

>
> > ...Comparison chart
>
> Compare to what? All of them? Just proprietary? Should we be selective (ie.
> just show the ones we meet or beat)?
>

I've been wrestling with the ethics involved here.   I guess I am thinking at 
this point that we list everything Quanta does and then all the other 
products and check them up against Quanta.  All the advertising does it that 
way so that means its okay right?

> > Screen Shots
> > Quanta can...
>
> Wouldn't the Features section cover this?

The features section would be more data orienteed... the Quanta can could be 
more text orienteed for different types of users.   Sections could expand on 
how Quanta does project management best, or the integration of different 
things.  Maybe this should be part of the features?  I like the idea of both 
a list approach and discussion approach.  hmmmm

> >
> > Can Quanta do XHTML?
>

> XHTML isn't anything special. How about just XML in general?

I XHTML can be validated and get a w3c sticker or something :)  Besides its a 
buzzword, so its gotta be good right :)



> Isn't Quanta Gold technically Quanta Plus' competitor?
>

Does Quanta Gold come for Linux?  I thought it was windows only, like Quanta 
being *nix only.  I could be wrong though



- -- 

Bill Chmura
Director of Internet Technology
Explosivo ITG
Wolcott, CT

p: 888.560.YWEB (9932)
e: bill at Explosivo.com
w. http://www.explosivo.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFARCFQEEA64RcvcRERApuZAJ4g7RwKKc2lTWxPC4nclsYYlb5oIgCguRUi
KePiruH5KimbPr9Cn26SZnw=
=AbbS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----