[kdewebdev-site] Changing subject lines

[Bill Chmura]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


Hi All,

I'd like to suggest changing subject lines as appropriate so things can be 
followed during and found easily after the fact.  I'd be like threading :)

I know its not always clear cut, but I think it can be done better....

Have a nice day,

Bill




On Monday 19 April 2004 12:44 am, David Joham wrote:
> > the strings to be translated. This is a better and different process than
> > it appeared on a quick perusal of the code.
>
> /me rubs head in confusion....
>
> :)
>
> Chris, Eric and friends...
>
> I would like to see (by the 25th or so if that's possible) a brief one to
> two page summary of the proposal(s) we have for localization. I only want
> to concentrate on localization at the moment - we'll get to how we're going
> to put the site together next.
>
> In order for me to follow what's going on, I'm going to ask for a little
> bit more documentation that I originally did. I would like to see a
> semi-formal proposal for each localization strategy we might want to use.
>
> I'd like the proposals to take the following general form:
>
> A: Intro
> B: Why we should use this method of localization
> C: Sample of how the localization table(s) would be built
> D: Sample PHP code that would use the localization table(s) in step C
> E: Strenghts of the proposal
> F: Weaknesses of the proposal
> G: Conclusion
>
>
> Step G is where bribes may be mentioned :)
>
> Please don't go too overboard. Put as much detail as necessary, but don't
> get too overboard. This isn't the design phase, just the proposal/prototype
> phase.
>
> In addition to the propsal, I would still like the working prototype so
> that we can see the code in action. I would like this prototype delivered
> in a .tar.gz file that anyone can uncompress and run  inside Apache.
>
> I apologize if people have submitted the code before and feel they're
> duplicating effort. Unless I get hit by a bus, this should be the last
> time :)
>
>
> At the moment, I have no preference for any method that has been proposed
> so far since I don't feel I have enough information to make a decision.
> That's why I'm asking for more info. I also don't have a preference if I
> get a single proposal or two (or more). Chris and Eric, if you want to work
> together to merge your ideas (it looks like they may be closer than
> originally thought) that would be just dandy. If there isn't a meeting of
> the minds, we'll take a look at both proposals and make a decision then.
>
> By the way, there were no additional comments on the vision statement. That
> means its final as previously posted. Tomorrow night, I'll post the
> official Final Vision Statement Document so that it can be officially
> cannonized in the archives.
>
> Please let me know if there's anything else I can do at the moment...
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> David
> _______________________________________________
> kdewebdev-site mailing list
> kdewebdev-site at mail.kdewebdev.org
> http://mail.kdewebdev.org/mailman/listinfo/kdewebdev-site

- -- 

Bill Chmura
Director of Internet Technology
Explosivo ITG
Wolcott, CT

p: 888.560.YWEB (9932)
e: bill at Explosivo.com
w. http://www.explosivo.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAg1nQEEA64RcvcRERAgu3AJwKVuQsWaEWXQl/puWmClJOrFyNbQCgkLIl
xSXbejblue2TIZalnCFV5B4=
=8s0K
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----